Summary:Elaborate use tests room a garbage of resources. The best results come from trial and error no an ext than 5 users and berlari as many kecil tests as you can afford.

Anda sedang menonton: 5 w 1 h dalam wawancara

Some setiap orang think that use is very costly and rumit and the user tests need to be scheduled for the rare web design project with a huge anggaran and a lavish time schedule. No true. Fancy usability tests space a waste of resources. The ideal results come from testing no much more than 5 customers and running as many small tests together you have the right to afford.

In previously research, Tom Landauer and also I showed that the number of usability problems found in a functionality test v n customers is:

N (1-(1- l ) n )

where N is the total number the usability difficulties in the design and together is the proportion of usability difficulties discovered ketika testing a single user. The common value the l is 31%, averaged throughout a besar number of jobs we studied. Plot the curve for l =31% offers the following result:


The paling striking truth of the curve is the zero users give zero insights.

As quickly as you collect data native a single test user, your insights shoot up and you have already learned nearly a 3rd of all there is come know around the usability of the design. The difference in between zero and also even a small bit the data is astounding.

When you test the 2nd user, girlfriend will find that this person melakukan some the the very same things as the an initial user, so there is part overlap in apa you learn. Orang are definitely different, so over there will tambahan be something new that the second user melakukan that girlfriend did no observe v the very first user. So the second user adds part amount of new insight, but not almost as much as the first user did.

The 3rd user will do many things the you currently observed with the very first user or with the second user and even some points that you have already seen twice. Plus, that course, the third user will certainly generate a small amount of new data, even if not as much as the first and the second user did.

As girlfriend add an ext and an ext users, you discover less and less since you will keep seeing the same things again and again. There is no real have to keep observing the exact same thing multiple times, and also you will certainly be an extremely motivated come go kembali to the drawing board and redesign the site to get rid of the usability problems.

After the 5th user, you are wasting her time by observing the very same findings repeatedly however not discovering much new.

Iterative Design

The curve jelas shows the you have to test with at least 15 users to discover all the usability troubles in the design. So why execute I recommend testing with a much smaller mageri of users?

The key reason is that it is better to distribution your anggaran for user testing across many small tests rather of blowing whatever on a single, intricate study. Let us say the you do have the capital to recruit 15 representative customers and also have lock test your design. Great. spend this anggaran on 3 research studies with 5 individuals each!

You want to run multiple tests since the actual goal the usability engineering is to enhance the design and also not hanya to document its weaknesses. After ~ the first study with lima participants has uncovered 85% of the functionality problems, girlfriend will want to fix these troubles in a redesign.

After creating the new design, you should check again. Even though I said that the redesign have to "fix" the problems found in the very first study, the kebenaran is the you think the the brand-new design overcomes the problems. But sejak nobody can design the perfect user interface, over there is no guarantee that the brand-new design melakukan in sebenarnya fix the problems. A 2nd test will discover whether the fixes functioned or even if it is they didn"t. Also, in introducing a new design, there is selalu the risk of introducing a brand-new usability problem, even if the old one did get fixed.

Also, the second belajar with 5 users will discover paling of the continuing to be 15% of the original usability troubles that menjadi not uncovered in the an initial round that testing. (There will still it is in 2% the the original difficulties left — they will have to wait until the third study to it is in identified.)

Finally, the second untuk mempelajari will have the ability to probe deeper right into the functionality of the fundamental struktur the the site, assessing problems like information architecture, job flow, and also match through user needs. This important worries are regularly obscured in initial studies where the users room stumped through stupid surface-level usability problems that protect against them from yes, really digging into the site.

So the second belajar will both serve as quality assurance of the outcome of the first belajar and membantu provide deeper insights as well. The second untuk mempelajari will always lead to a new (but smaller) list of usability problems to resolve in a redesign. And the same insight uses to this redesign: no all the fixes will work; part deeper problems will it is in uncovered after cleaning up the interface. Thus, a third belajar is required as well.

The ultimate user experience is boosted much much more by 3 research studies with 5 customers each 보다 by a solitary monster riset with 15 users.

Why no Test with a single User?

You could think the 15 researches with a solitary user would certainly be even better than 3 research studies with 5 users. The curve does show the we learn much much more from the first user 보다 from any type of subsequent users, for this reason why keep going? 2 reasons:

There is selalu a danger of gift misled by the spurious actions of a single person who may perform certain bertindak by accident or in one unrepresentative manner. Even 3 customers are enough to get an idea of the diversity in user behavior and also insight right into what"s unique and apa can it is in generalized.

When come Test an ext Users

You have to test added users once a website has actually several highly distinctive groups that users. The formula just holds for similar users who will be using the website in reasonably similar ways.

If, because that example, you have a website that will certainly be digunakan by both children and parents, kemudian the two groups of users will have sufficiently berbeda behavior that it becomes vital to check with setiap orang from both groups. The same would be true for a system aimed in ~ connecting purchasing agents with sales staff.

Even once the groups of customers are really different, there will still be an excellent similarities in between the monitorings from the 2 groups. Every the users room human, ~ all. Also, many of the usability problems are regarded the basic way setiap orang interact through the Web and the influence from various other sites top top user behavior.

Lihat lainnya: Harga Redmi 8A Pro Bekas Like New Ram 3Gb, Jual Redmi 8A Pro 3Gb Terbaru

In trial and error multiple teams of different users, girlfriend don"t require to encompass as many members of each group as you would certainly in a single test of a solitary group the users. The overlap in between observations will ensure a much better outcome from trial and error a smaller number of setiap orang in each group. I recommend:

3–4 customers from each category if trial and error two teams of users3 customers from each classification if trial and error three or much more groups of individuals (you always want at least 3 customers to ensure that you have actually covered the diversity of habits within the group)


Nielsen, Jakob, and also Landauer, cutting board K.: "A mathematical model of the detect of use problems," Proceedings that ACM INTERCHI"93 Conference (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24-29 April 1993), pp. 206-213.